Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highly resistant or resistant genotypes comprised 56% of sugar sorghum genotypes.

Taxon: sugar sorghume0
Outcome: highly resistant and resistant speciese1
Value: 56%e0

Verbatim

e0
“56% of sugar sorghum genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1327

e1
“highly resistant and resistant species”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1190

Title

Osmotic stress resistance of different sorghum species affected by NaСl

V. L. Gaze; V. A. Golubova; N. V. Yanovskaya; et al. Agrarian science 2022. doi:10.32634/0869-8155-2022-363-10-96-99

Other claims from this paper (15)

Observation Grain sorghum germination energy under salinity was 53.1%.
Observation Grain sorghum laboratory germination under salinity was 62.0%.
Observation Sweet sorghum germination energy under salinity was 39.1%.
Observation Sweet sorghum laboratory germination under salinity was 43.1.
Observation Sudan grass germination energy under salinity was 30.1.
Observation Sudan grass laboratory germination under salinity was 33.5%.
Observation Highly resistant or resistant genotypes comprised 61% of grain sorghum genotypes.
Observation Highly resistant or resistant genotypes comprised 6% of Sudan grass genotypes.
Observation Grain sorghum was least susceptible to salinity stress among the species studied.
Observation Nine grain sorghum genotypes showed highest salt resistance, with germination rates from 87.5 to 95.9%.
Observation Uch. 29/20 showed germination of 95.95% under severe salinity.
Observation Uch. 20/20 showed germination of 93.9% under severe salinity.
Observation Uch. 21/20 showed germination of 93.8% under severe salinity.
Observation Jetta x Uch. 45/20 showed germination of 91.5% under severe salinity.
Observation Uch. 7/20 showed germination of 90.8% under severe salinity.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highly resistant or resistant genotypes comprised 6% of Sudan grass genotypes.

Taxon: Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiie0
Outcome: highly resistant and resistant speciese1
Value: 6%e0

Verbatim

e0
“6% of Sudan grass genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1359

e1
“highly resistant and resistant species”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1190

Title

Osmotic stress resistance of different sorghum species affected by NaСl

V. L. Gaze; V. A. Golubova; N. V. Yanovskaya; et al. Agrarian science 2022. doi:10.32634/0869-8155-2022-363-10-96-99

Other claims from this paper (15)

Observation Grain sorghum germination energy under salinity was 53.1%.
Observation Grain sorghum laboratory germination under salinity was 62.0%.
Observation Sweet sorghum germination energy under salinity was 39.1%.
Observation Sweet sorghum laboratory germination under salinity was 43.1.
Observation Sudan grass germination energy under salinity was 30.1.
Observation Sudan grass laboratory germination under salinity was 33.5%.
Observation Highly resistant or resistant genotypes comprised 61% of grain sorghum genotypes.
Observation Highly resistant or resistant genotypes comprised 56% of sugar sorghum genotypes.
Observation Grain sorghum was least susceptible to salinity stress among the species studied.
Observation Nine grain sorghum genotypes showed highest salt resistance, with germination rates from 87.5 to 95.9%.
Observation Uch. 29/20 showed germination of 95.95% under severe salinity.
Observation Uch. 20/20 showed germination of 93.9% under severe salinity.
Observation Uch. 21/20 showed germination of 93.8% under severe salinity.
Observation Jetta x Uch. 45/20 showed germination of 91.5% under severe salinity.
Observation Uch. 7/20 showed germination of 90.8% under severe salinity.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The ELISA method significantly differentiated resistant and moderately resistant barley genotypes from susceptible genotypes.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Material: resistant and moderately resistant genotypese1
Outcome: differentiatede2
Comparator: susceptible genotypese2

Verbatim

e0
“barley seedling plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102

e1
“Using the described method, resistant and moderately resistant genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1225

e2
“were significantly differentiated from susceptible genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1311

Title

Screening for Barley yellow dwarf virus‐Resistant Barley Genotypes by Assessment of Virus Content in Inoculated Seedlings

V. Šíp; L. ŠIrlová; J. Chrpová Journal of Phytopathology 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0434.2006.01103.x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend resistant genotypes for breeding resistant varieties.

Taxon: genotypese0
Outcome: development of resistant varietiese0

Verbatim

e0
“identified resistant genotypes can be further utilized for development of resistant varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1039

Title

Evaluation of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes against Phyllody Disease

Varaprasada Rao; P Sandhya Rani; P Haritha; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2025. doi:10.22271/phyto.2025.v14.i4a.15449

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Twenty-seven genotypes showed an immune phyllody reaction.
Observation The phyllody reaction listing reported 20 moderately resistant genotypes.
Observation Thirteen genotypes were tolerant to phyllody.
Observation Twelve genotypes were moderately susceptible to phyllody.
Observation Ten genotypes were susceptible to phyllody.
Observation Nine genotypes showed a resistant reaction in the second disease listing.
Observation Fourteen genotypes showed a moderately resistant reaction in the second listing.
Observation Seventy-seven genotypes showed susceptible reactions in the second listing.
Observation No genotype was immune to powdery mildew.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Principal coordinate analysis separated resistant, moderately resistant, and susceptible genotypes.

Outcome: resistant genotypes, moderately resistant genotypes, and susceptible genotypes into distinct componentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“principal coordinate analysis, which categorized resistant genotypes, moderately resistant genotypes, and susceptible genotypes into distinct components”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1179

Title

Genomic dissection of brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) resistance in Indica rice genotypes

Chanchala Meher; Govindharaj Guru‐Pirasanna‐Pandi; Soumya Bharati Babu; et al. Annals of Applied Biology 2024. doi:10.1111/aab.12899

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Markers had average genetic diversity of 0.165.
Observation Markers had polymorphic information content of 0.145.
Observation Population and cluster analysis divided genotypes into three groups with resistant genotypes separate.
Observation Genetic variation was 90% between individuals of populations.
Observation Genetic variation was 10% between populations.
Association Six SSR markers were significantly associated with planthopper resistance phenotypes.
Recommendation The identified resistance genes could aid development of durable resistant rice varieties.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Moderately resistant genotypes could be useful for developing resistant soybean genotypes.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome: sources for developing resistant soybean genotypese0

Verbatim

e0
“The genotypes identified as having moderate resistance across the three years could be useful as sources for developing resistant soybean genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1166

Title

Evaluation of Soybean Genotypes for Resistance to Charcoal Rot

Alemu Mengistu; P. A. Arelli; J. P. Bond; et al. Plant Health Progress 2011. doi:10.1094/php-2010-0926-01-rs

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observation Root colonization varied significantly among genotypes and years.
Observation No genotype was consistently immune to charcoal rot each year.
Observation Six genotypes were moderately resistant.
Observation Some commercial and public genotypes had resistance equal to or greater than DT97-4290.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In clustering of chickpea genotypes, resistant and moderately resistant genotypes clustered together while susceptible genotypes did not cluster with any other genotype.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome: resistant genotypes and moderately resistant genotypes form cluster with each othere0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Clustering of chickpea genotypes shows that resistant genotypes and moderately resistant genotypes form cluster with each other while susceptible genotypes do not form any cluster with any other genotype”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–909

Title

Antioxidants Potential in Seeds of Chickpea Genotypes Differing in Helicoverpa armigera Resistance

Anterpreet Kaur; Satvir Kaur Grewal; Ravinder Singh Indian Journal of Agricultural Biochemistry 2017. doi:10.5958/0974-4479.2017.00026.0

Other claims from this paper (7)

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Advanced phenotyping identified four resistant and five moderately resistant genotypes.

Taxon: ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome: resistant and five moderately resistant genotypese0
Value: four resistant and five moderately resistante0

Verbatim

e0
“Advanced screening of these 19 genotypes under phenotyping technique yielded four resistant and five moderately resistant genotypes.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1012

t0
“Chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–91

Title

Identification of Resistant Genotypes and Integrated Management of Dry Root Rot of Chickpea

Gururaj Sunkad; Deepa Dore; Meghana Patil; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2023. doi:10.18805/lr-5149

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observation Initial screening identified fourteen resistant and five moderately resistant genotypes.
Intervention effect Combined seed treatment and soil drenching yielded the least disease incidence.
Intervention effect The same treatment gave the highest seed yield, test weight and benefit cost ratio.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant lettuce genotypes from choice tests remained resistant without choice.

Taxon: LettuceLactuca sativat0
Material: resistant genotypese0
Outcome: resistante0
Setting: no-choice conditionse0

Verbatim

e0
“resistant genotypes from choice tests remain resistant under no-choice conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1544

t0
“Lettuce”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46

Title

Host Plant Resistance to Leafminers in Lettuce

Beiquan Mou; Yong-Biao Liu Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 2004. doi:10.21273/jashs.129.3.383

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation Wild Lactuca species had fewer leafminer stings than cultivated lettuce.
Observation Among cultivated lettuce, leaf types had the lowest sting density and romaine the highest.
Association Field sting results correlated with cage results in 2001 and 2002.
Observation Field sting density broad-sense heritability was 81.6% in 2001 and 67.4% in 2002.
Association Pupae per plant or leaf correlated moderately with sting density.
Association Pupae production did not correlate with leaf weight.
Mechanism Lettuce germplasm showed antixenosis and antibiosis to leafminers.
Recommendation The authors suggest genetic improvement of lettuce for leafminer resistance is feasible.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rank-sum classified four resistant, 15 medium resistant, 34 medium sensitive, and 11 sensitive genotypes.

Taxon: bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome: resistante1
Value: four genotypese1
Qualifier: 15 genotypes as medium resistant, 34 genotypes as medium sensitive, and 11 genotypes as sensitivee1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“bread wheat genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–222

e1
“four genotypes were defined as resistant, 15 genotypes as medium resistant, 34 genotypes as medium sensitive, and 11 genotypes as sensitive”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1245

Title

Physiological characterization of Turkish bread wheat genotypes for resistance to late drought stress

Ali ÖZTÜRK; Murat AYDIN TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 2017. doi:10.3906/tar-1705-54

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observation Genotypes varied significantly for all measured traits.
Intervention effect Late drought decreased grain yield.
Intervention effect Late drought decreased CTD, SPAD, Fm, Fv and Fv/Fm.
Intervention effect Late drought decreased leaf ash content.
Intervention effect Late drought increased leaf senescence rate.
Intervention effect Late drought increased grain ash content.
Observation Resistant M?fitbey and Dağdaş 94 produced the highest grain yields under late drought and were promising breeding parents.
Association Rank-sum values correlated negatively with CTD, SPAD, Fm, Fv and Fv/Fm.
Association Rank-sum values correlated positively with LSR.
Method / resource Fv, CTD and SPAD measurements at 15 days post anthesis were identified as optimal for screening drought resistance.
Method / resource Fv15DPA, Fv25DPA, CTD15DPA and SPAD15DPA explained 75.2% of rank-sum variation.
Recommendation The authors recommend the four combined traits as selection criteria for classifying late drought resistance.

“resistant genotypes”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics