View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Root effectiveness was better represented by tertiary and quaternary root absorption efficiency .
Organ / stagetertiary and quaternary root e4 Outcometertiary and quaternary root absorption efficiency e4 Qualifierbetter represented e4 Verbatim
t0 “Rice Production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 e4 “root effectiveness was better represented by tertiary and quaternary root absorption efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–850 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Under drought, root P efficiency ratio, absorption efficiency and transfer efficiency increased with P concentration.
TreatmentP concentration e0 Outcomeroot P efficiency ratio, P absorption efficiency, and P transfer efficiency e0 Directionincrease inferred e0 Qualifierdrought conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “Under drought conditions, root P efficiency ratio, P absorption efficiency , and P transfer efficiency were all proportional to P concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–893 t0 “cotton cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Root efficiency ratio classified genotypes by P absorption efficiency .
OutcomeP absorption efficiency (PAE) e0 t0 Comparatorrecovery rate of P e0 t0 Verbatim
e0 “classify the genotypes according to their P absorption efficiency (PAE) using the recovery rate of P and the root efficiency ratio ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1165 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–57 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Boron concentration influenced root iron content and iron absorption efficiency in cotton.
OutcomeFe content in the roots, Fe absorption efficiency e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Fe content in the root s, Fe absorption efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–787 t0 “Boron-zinc interaction in the absorption of micronutrients by cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen availability altered uptake efficiency , root absorption capacity, aboveground demand and nutrient use efficiency for several nutrients.
TreatmentIncreasing N availability e0 Outcomeuptake efficiency, root absorption capacity, aboveground demand, and nutrient use efficiency e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Increasing N availability altered uptake efficiency , root absorption capacity, aboveground demand, and nutrient use efficiency for several nutrients ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1914 t0 “Rhododendron ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Light shading promoted lateral root growth and improved nutrient absorption efficiency .
Outcomelateral root growth and improve nutrient absorption efficiency e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Pinus yunnanensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 e0 “light shading can promote lateral root growth and improve nutrient absorption efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1122 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Residue cover usually improves shallow root growth and absorption efficiency .
Outcomeroot growth and root absorption efficiency e0 Qualifiershallow soil layers e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Although residue cover usually improves root growth and root absorption efficiency at shallow soil layers, the stratification could result in lower P or K uptake by plants during dry periods. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1102 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 Other claims from this paper (2) Mechanism hypothesis original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest lower root moisture absorption efficiency might reduce soybean stem sap flow.
Qualifierlower root moisture absorption efficiency e0 Verbatim
e0 “reduced FRSS, which might have resulted from the lower root moisture absorption efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1212 t0 “Soybean and Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–40 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Differences in NUE among cultivars were more associated with shoot efficiency than with root absorption efficiency .
OutcomeDifferences in NUE among cultivars e7 Comparatorroot absorption efficiency e7 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “genetic selection of Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.) is often conducted at high levels of N application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–196 e7 “Differences in NUE among cultivars were more associated with shoot efficiency than with root absorption efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1597 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect With high N supply, total plant N accumulation increased in each Kentucky bluegrass cultivar. Intervention effect With high N supply, N-root uptake efficiency increased in each Kentucky bluegrass cultivar. Intervention effect With high N supply, NUE decreased in Kentucky bluegrass cultivars. Intervention effect With high N supply, shoot efficiency ratio decreased in Kentucky bluegrass cultivars. Association The magnitude and relative response of N efficiency traits depend on genotype and medium. Intervention effect Cultivars Asset, Dawn and Trenton were higher yielding than Limousine, Barzan or Midnight at low N supply. Intervention effect Cultivars Asset, Dawn and Trenton were more responsive to increasing solution N concentration than Limousine, Barzan or Midnight. Intervention effect Cultivars Asset, Dawn and Trenton were more efficient in NUE at low N supply than Limousine, Barzan or Midnight. Observation Under low N supply in nutrient solution, NUE of Limousine was 26.2 g plant dry weight per mg N. Observation Under low N supply in nutrient solution, NUE of Asset was 40.1. Observation Under low N supply in soil, NUE of Midnight was 63.6. Observation Under low N supply in soil, NUE of Asset was 77.4. Intervention effect NUE was noticeably higher in soil than in nutrient solution culture. Observation Genotypic differences in N efficiency traits in solution culture were also apparent in soil. Recommendation NUE in Kentucky bluegrass can be enhanced by cultivar selection under low N conditions. Method / resource Solution culture can serve as an effective surrogate for characterizing NUE in bluegrass cultivars compared with soil. Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
BY1 had maximal root collar diameter, biomass, root /shoot ratio, leaf area and nutrient absorption and utility efficiency among four clones.
Outcomeroot collar diameter, biomass, root/shoot ratio, leaf area, nutrient absorption and utility efficiency e0 Comparatorthe four clones e0 Verbatim
e0 “maximum root collar diameter, biomass, root /shoot ratio, leaf area, nutrient absorption and utility efficiency among the four clones. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1125 e1 “Clone BY1 had the highest phosphorus- efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–938 t0 “Betula alnoides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–49 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.