View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Severe rust infection did not significantly affect grain phosphorus concentration.
TreatmentSevere stripe rust infection e0 Interactorstripe rust e0 pathogen Outcomeconcentration of grain phosphorus e0 Directiondid not significantly affect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Severe stripe rust infection did not significantly affect the concentration of grain phosphorus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–845 e1 “12 wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–131 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Combining Yr29 and Yr46 gave an additive but nonsignificant mean 5% reduction in stripe rust severity.
Verbatim
e0 “The effect of combining Yr29 and Yr46 was additive but not significant, with a mean reduction of 5% in severity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1257 e1 “leaf rust and stripe rust , caused by Puccinia triticina Erikss. and P. striiformis Westend. f. sp. tritici ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–247 t0 “Indian Wheat Cultivar ‘New Pusa 876’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
SA did not significantly alter stripe rust resistance in the resistant wheat cultivar.
Materialresistant cultivar e0 Directionno significant effect e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was no significant effect observed in resistance of resistant cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–639 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative humidity range showed non-significant variation, so its impact on stripe rust could not be assessed.
Treatmentrelative humidity e2 Outcomevariation in range between minimum and maximum mean relative humidity e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “WITH STRIPE RUST IN WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–80 e2 “Impact of relative humidity could not be assessed because variation in range between minimum and maximum mean relative humidity remained non-significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–941 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
None of Tambar 401, Tambar 500 and Kold sustained significant yield loss to barley stripe rust .
Materialthese three cultivars e7 Outcomesignificant yield loss e7 Verbatim
e0 “Barley stripe rust (caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. hordei ) was found for the first time in the United States in 1991 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 e7 “and none of these three cultivars sustained significant yield loss to barley stripe rust ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1818 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No significant QTL by race interaction was detected for barley stripe rust resistance.
OutcomeQTL × race interaction e0 Directionno significant e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was no significant QTL × race interaction ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1274 e1 “barley stripe rust (caused by Puccinia striiformis Westend. f. sp. hordei ) in a set of barley (Hordeum vulgare L. subsp. vulgare ) doubled haploid (DH) lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–660 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Neither resistance type significantly affected stripe rust urediniospore germination, which remained high.
Outcomespore germination e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “urediniospoe germination in all genotypes / isolates/ leaf stage combination was high and neither resistance type affected spore germination significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1410 e1 “spring wheat (Triticum aestivalis L.), possessing resistance gene Yr-18 to some isolates (race specific resistance) of stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–250 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A virulent stripe - rust race did not significantly induce TaMCA4 transcripts.
Outcometranscript level e0 Directionnot significantly induced e0 Verbatim
e0 “the transcript level was not significantly induced by the virulent race ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1025 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–21 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Spore suspension concentrations of 5 and 10 mg/ml gave no significant difference in wheat stripe rust incidence at 12 and 15 days after inoculation.
Treatmentspore concentrations e2 Outcomedisease incidences e2 Directionno_change inferred e2 Qualifierat 12 and 15 days after inoculation e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Wheat stripe rust , caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst), is one of the most important and devastating diseases of wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–134 e2 “When the spore concentrations were 5 and 10 mg/ml, the disease incidences had no significant differences at 12 and 15 days after inoculation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–754 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Spraying did not significantly increase Kopara yield.
Not reported Treatment Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “increased yield significantly in Tiritea but not in Kopara or Karamu ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–560 e1 “stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.