Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T9 increased nodules per plant to 32.96.

A claim from Influence of Phosphorus and Sulphur on Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 increased nodules per plant to 32.96.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Phosphorus at 60 kg/ha with Sulphur at 30 kg/hae0
Outcome
number of nodules per plante0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
32.96e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Phosphorus at 60 kg/ha with Sulphur at 30 kg/ha (T9) recorded significant improvement in growth parameters, viz., plant height (52.02 cm), number of branches per plant (26.33), number of nodules per plant (32.96), plant dry weight (24.20 g) and crop growth rate (24.09 g/m²/day)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–715
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67

Title

Influence of Phosphorus and Sulphur on Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Mohd Arish; Vikram Singh; Amit Kumar; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2025. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2025/v37i95720

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-0fcbbd8f121d15cba9b5e7d10c90899da6ab8502a2823be235e67c3a6e2f416f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

phosphorus · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

51 papers: 50 positive, 1 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.