Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil ZnSO4 at 15 kg ha-1 plus foliar ZnSO4 at knee high stage produced higher yield attributes and yield.

A claim from Performance of Sweet Corn Hybrids (Zea mays saccharata) as Influenced by Soil and Foliar Application of Zinc · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil ZnSO4 at 15 kg ha-1 plus foliar ZnSO4 at knee high stage produced higher yield attributes and yield.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
soil application of ZnSO4 @ 15 kg ha-1 + ZnSO4 (0.5%) foliar spray at knee high stagee0
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of ZnSO4 @ 15 kg ha-1 + ZnSO4 (0.5%) foliar spray at knee high stage produced significantly higher yield attributes and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1259
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–25

Title

Performance of Sweet Corn Hybrids (Zea mays saccharata) as Influenced by Soil and Foliar Application of Zinc

Altaf Hussain Lone; Tahir Ahmad Sheikh; Bilal Ahmad Lone; et al. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 2022. doi:10.9734/jeai/2022/v44i122090

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-0ffd8f2ae0e4f0de9e4ccc2b360e38c4d97df6e65e7fbc8319b926865d3ce0b0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

128 papers: 124 positive, 4 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Combined zinc significantly increased corn, dry matter and green fodder yields over no zinc.

    Quality Studies and Yield as Influenced by Zinc Fertilization in Baby Corn (Zea mays L.) · 2017 · compared with control (no zinc)

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Zinc sulfate at 25 versus 35 kg ha -1 did not significantly alter maize grain yield.

    Production and Profitability of Maize as Influenced by Different Levels of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Zinc in Central Plateau Zone of Maharashtra · 2017

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Zinc sulfate doses produced no change in grain yield.

    FOLIAR FEEDING WITH ZINC AS A BIOFORTIFICATION STRATEGY IN MAIZE · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Foliar ZnSO 4 was less effective than soil applied Zn on the more calcareous soil.

    III. Response of sweet corn to sources of zinc · 1977 · compared with soil‐applied Zn

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    M1 plus S8 was on par with M1 plus S4.

    Growth and Yield of Rabi Maize (Zea mays L.) at Different Planting Densities and N-Levels · 2017 · compared with M1 (1,00,000 plants ha-1) and S4 (300 kg N ha-1)

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    Optimal zinc fertilizer increased summer maize grain yield.

    Effects of zinc fertilizer rate and application method on photosynthetic characteristics and grain yield of summer maize · 2016

    Same direction

  7. positive
    ZnSO4 yielded the highest corn dry matter production.

    Influence of water solubility of granular zinc fertilizers on plant uptake and growth · 1999

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Sole and combined zinc and iron sulfate application improved maize yield attributes.

    Biofortification of maize with zinc and iron not only enhances crop growthbut also improves grain quality · 2021

    Same direction

119 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Combined zinc significantly increased corn, dry matter and green fodder yields over no zinc.

    Quality Studies and Yield as Influenced by Zinc Fertilization in Baby Corn (Zea mays L.) · 2017 · compared with control (no zinc)

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Foliar fungicides did not significantly improve yield in damaged or nondamaged plots.

    Effect of Foliar Fungicides on Corn with Simulated Hail Damage · 2009 · compared with nontreated controls

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    More than three spray applications generally gave no further yield gain.

    Maize Yield Response to Chemical Control of Spodoptera frugiperda at Different Plant Growth Stages in South Africa · 2021

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Foliar fertilizer applied from 2 weeks after silking reduced corn grain yield by 6.4% in 1977.

    Corn Grain Yield and Nutrient Response to Foliar Fertilizer Applied during Grain Fill1 · 1982

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Corn yield reduction was 1.5 times greater with proportional volume at the 12.5% rate.

    Effect of Carrier Volume on Corn (Zea mays) and Soybean (Glycine max) Response to Simulated Drift of Glyphosate and Glufosinate1 · 2002 · compared with constant spray volume

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Nano-N plus nano-Zn with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Offset corn had lower nitrogen concentration and yield.

    Corn Production Associated with Liquid Beef Manure Application Methods · 1991 · compared with corn planted over the zone

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Foliar cocktail caused no grain yield trade-off.

    Biofortification of different maize cultivars with zinc, iron and selenium by foliar fertilizer applications · 2023

    Opposite direction

620 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.