Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Isoproturon plus 2, 4-D increased yield relative to 2, 4-D alone in grass weed fields.

A claim from Influence of Fluroxypyr, Isoproturon and 2, 4-D of Weed Control in Wheat · 1993

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus 2, 4-D increased yield relative to 2, 4-D alone in grass weed fields.

Treatment
combination of Isoproturon and 2, 4-D at 0.75 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
2, 4-D applied alonee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of Isoproturon and 2, 4-D at 0.75 kg/ha increased the grain yield of wheat over fluroxypyr or 2, 4-D applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–504

Title

Influence of Fluroxypyr, Isoproturon and 2, 4-D of Weed Control in Wheat

R.S. Panwar; R. K. Malik; R. S. Balyan Indian Journal of Weed Science 1993

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-16e84e6949d7ddbd63a8d882630039ab5dae529233bccc2e051e17304b00c57c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

80 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this claim · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.