Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc gave better grain protein content of 10.1% than other treatments.

A claim from Impact of Different Zinc Application Methods on Yield and Yield Components of Various Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc gave better grain protein content of 10.1% than other treatments.

Treatment
zinc was applied both in the soil before planting and by foliar application on later growth stagese1
Outcome
grain protein contentse0
Direction
bettere1
Value
10.1%e0
Comparator
all other treatmentse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain protein contents (10.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1466
e1

“zinc was applied both in the soil before planting and by foliar application on later growth stages, which is better than all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1691
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91

Title

Impact of Different Zinc Application Methods on Yield and Yield Components of Various Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars

Usman Afzal; Muhammad Shahid Ibni Zamir; Shan Mohi Ud Din; et al. American Journal of Plant Sciences 2017. doi:10.4236/ajps.2017.813236

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-1b556234221821c6105581f11bb9e3d1d4c4b801e854ca6ada70da5c62d0eb70 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

64 papers: 56 positive, 8 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

stage · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 110 positive, 15 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.