Intervention effectmodel-written summary

V1F5 increased seed yield by 12.9 - 16.1% versus 100% RDF through WSF.

A claim from Evaluation of DSSAT CROPGRO model on growth and yield of pigeonpea cultivars under different fertigation levels · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V1F5 increased seed yield by 12.9 - 16.1% versus 100% RDF through WSF.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
drip fertigation at 125% RDF via WSF + Azophosmet and foliar spray of 1% PPFMe1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
12.9 - 16.1 %e1
Comparator
drip fertigation at 100% RDF through WSFe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pigeonpea growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–191
e1

“The increase in seed yield with drip fertigation at 125% RDF via WSF + Azophosmet and foliar spray of 1% PPFM (V1F5) was 8.0 - 11.0% when compared to drip fertigation at 100% RDF via WSF + Azophosmet and foliar spray of 1% PPFM (V1F4)12.9 - 16.1 % compared to drip fertigation at 100% RDF through WSF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1410

Title

Evaluation of DSSAT CROPGRO model on growth and yield of pigeonpea cultivars under different fertigation levels

R. Jeyajothi; S. Pazhanivelan; M. Saravana Kumar; et al. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2023. doi:10.31018/jans.v15i3.4740

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-1c4ee53ff65635aa786bb5698c59c9d3574d17178ed1bf3448439daa4743267f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 87 positive, 6 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

84 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

51 papers: 51 positive, 0 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.