Intervention effectmodel-written summary

These later sequences had significantly lower yield attributes and yield.

A claim from Efficacy of Isoproturon in Relation to Irrigation and Top Dressing of Nitrogen in Wheat · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

These later sequences had significantly lower yield attributes and yield.

Treatment
Irrigation (25 DAS) fb top dressing of nitrogen (30 DAS) fb isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha (35 DAS) and irrigal ion (25 DAS) fb isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha fb top dressing of nitrogene1
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recorded significantly lower values of all the yield attributes and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–999
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87
e1

“Irrigation (25 DAS) fb top dressing of nitrogen (30 DAS) fb isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha (35 DAS) and irrigal ion (25 DAS) fb isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha fb top dressing of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–848

Title

Efficacy of Isoproturon in Relation to Irrigation and Top Dressing of Nitrogen in Wheat

J. P. Saini; N. N. Angiras Indian Journal of Weed Science 1998

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-1e23b6d8d51322eb4bb97cbac5af38bdc92d4e4d841ebbf8b1e74031e69e48aa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 74 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

80 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

191 papers in the same direction as this claim · 797 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

324 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1,736 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2,052 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.