Claim · model-written summary
Six irrigations under conventional tillage maximized gross returns, net returns and benefit:cost ratio.
- Taxon
- wheat (Triticum aestivum)
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 6 irrigations un- der conventional tillage managemente0
- Outcome
- gross returns, net returns and benefit: cost ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The gross returns, net returns and benefit: cost ratio were maximum when the crop received 6 irrigations un- der conventional tillage management.”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Title
SAUMI GOSWAMI; RAMYAJIT MONDAL; A.M. PUSTE; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v65i1.2967
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Increasing irrigation frequency from IW:CPE 0.4 to 1.0 significantly promoted wheat growth parameters.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage produced significantly higher wheat growth parameters than minimum tillage.
- Intervention effect Six irrigations gave the highest wheat consumptive use.
- Intervention effect Five irrigations gave the highest consumptive-use efficiency.
- Intervention effect Six irrigations maximized wheat spike number, spike length, and filled grains per spike.
- Intervention effect Six irrigations maximized wheat grain and straw yield, closely followed by five irrigations.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage maximized wheat spikes per square meter, with a significant tillage difference.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage produced significantly higher wheat grain and straw yields than minimum tillage.
- Recommendation The authors recommend six irrigations with conventional tillage to augment wheat yield, consumptive-use efficiency and economics in West Bengal.