Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two applications produced grain zinc concentrations of 44.3 and 52.4 mg kg −1 in Years 2 and 3.

A claim from Agronomic and economic response of bread wheat to foliar zinc application · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two applications produced grain zinc concentrations of 44.3 and 52.4 mg kg −1 in Years 2 and 3.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
application of Zn at both heading and floweringe0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
44.3 and 52.4 mg kg −1e0
Qualifier
35–93%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the application of Zn at both heading and flowering, grain Zn concentration reached 44.3 and 52.4 mg kg −1 (in Years 2 and 3), implying an increase of 35–93% compared to the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–892
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–46

Title

Agronomic and economic response of bread wheat to foliar zinc application

Reza Keshavarz Afshar; Chengci Chen; Shuang Zhou; et al. Agronomy Journal 2020. doi:10.1002/agj2.20247

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-2271d69eaf79efbfab5f20d2dab2978382847cbf70c5c32250eefd024901e3c2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

stage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.