Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The integrated fertilizer, Sesbania, and Azolla treatment gave the highest rice grain and straw N, P, and K uptake.

A claim from Impact of integrated nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield in low land rice · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated fertilizer, Sesbania, and Azolla treatment gave the highest rice grain and straw N, P, and K uptake.

Treatment
150: 50: 50 kg N, P2O5, K2O + 25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 through inorganic sources + Sesbania aculeata @ 6.25 t ha-1 + Azolla @ 500 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
uptake of N, P and K by grain and strawe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The integrated use of 150: 50: 50 kg N, P2O5, K2O + 25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 through inorganic sources + Sesbania aculeata @ 6.25 t ha-1 + Azolla @ 500 kg ha-1 recorded the highest grain and straw yield of wet land rice and the highest uptake of N, P and K by grain and straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–629

Title

Impact of integrated nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield in low land rice

Prabha Susan; R K Kaleeswari Agricultural Research Journal 2015. doi:10.5958/2395-146x.2015.00060.5

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-2b00d4e2c01ac217597cf5c50bbfabc5040806a078a014e9c2c55937e3eb57a3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 60 positive, 5 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Sesbania bispinosa · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Azolla · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.