Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment T2 produced maximum dry plant weight of 42.67.

A claim from Effect of Nano Urea on Growth, Productivity and Economic Return in Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T2 produced maximum dry plant weight of 42.67.

Treatment
T2: T1+ Two spray of Nano Urea at active tillering stage and Panicle initiatione0
Outcome
Dry weight (g.) plant-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
42.67e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum Plant height (108.66 cm), Number of tillers hill-1 (10.83), Fresh weight (g.) plant-1 (146.44 g.), Dry weight (g.) plant-1 (42.67), Leaf area index (6.07), were achieved under treatment T2: T1+ Two spray of Nano Urea at active tillering stage and Panicle initiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1595
t0

“Effect of Nano Urea on Growth, Productivity and Economic Return in Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102

Title

Effect of Nano Urea on Growth, Productivity and Economic Return in Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Janardan Prasad Bagri; Sanjeev Kumar; M.Z. Siddiqui; et al. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 2025. doi:10.9734/jeai/2025/v47i103825

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-2c8a5c8d47ddbd9a845134c26b6e60cdece9e6b3e0fc7768e6fee0762696a7f5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 132 positive, 12 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

135 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

tillage · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

149 papers: 116 positive, 33 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 149 papers →

application · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

313 papers: 274 positive, 39 negative or no effect

273 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

304 papers more in this group

See all 313 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.