Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The integrated nutrient treatment produced significantly higher number of cluster per plant.

A claim from Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield and yield attributes of yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata (L.) walp. ssp. sesquipedalis verdc.) · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated nutrient treatment produced significantly higher number of cluster per plant.

Treatment
75% RDN through inorganic+25% RDN through vermicompost + biofertilizers (Rhizobium + PSB)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
number of cluster per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
48.30e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of cluster per plant (48.30), pods per cluster (3.93), pod length (62.08 cm), pod girth (24.87 cm), pod yield per plant (263.70 g), total yield (14.26 t/ha) and seeds per pod (15.06) recorded significantly higher in the treatment of 75% RDN through inorganic+25% RDN through vermicompost + biofertilizers (Rhizobium + PSB).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–703
t0

“yardlong bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87

Title

Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield and yield attributes of yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata (L.) walp. ssp. sesquipedalis verdc.)

G Sindhuja; Tskk Kiran Patro; Salomi Suneetha; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2021

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-35afca3d3d095d8ae30d9d5427a72334c6081b2d6f898799eb30292c536475ed · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

47 papers: 47 positive, 0 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

283 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.