Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The residue based sequence increased wheat yield by 17.9% in 2012-13.

A claim from Effect of conservation agriculture and weed management on weeds, soil microbial activity and wheat (Triticum aestivum) productivity under a rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat cropping system · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The residue based sequence increased wheat yield by 17.9% in 2012-13.

Treatment
DSR + MR – ZTW + RR –ZTSMB + WRe0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17.9e0
Qualifier
2012-13e0
Comparator
TPR–CTWe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in wheat yield due to the DSR + MR – ZTW + RR –ZTSMB + WR was 17.9 and 18.4%, respectively in 2012-13 and 2013-14 over that in TPR–CTW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1505

Title

Effect of conservation agriculture and weed management on weeds, soil microbial activity and wheat (Triticum aestivum) productivity under a rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat cropping system

JITESH KUMAR BAGHEL; T K DAS; RISHI RAJ; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2018. doi:10.56093/ijas.v88i11.84911

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-36e82b33fdd4f558bb3d13b7175583eaae98494d4f46ef70c12cc7349dbb0baa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Vigna radiata · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

145 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.