Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dry matter accumulation of baby corn was highest (45.26 g per plant) with soil application of 6 kg Zn per ha plus one foliar spray of 0.05% Zn at 25 DAS.

A claim from Effect of zinc on growth, yields, zinc use efficiency and economics in baby corn · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter accumulation of baby corn was highest (45.26 g per plant) with soil application of 6 kg Zn per ha plus one foliar spray of 0.05% Zn at 25 DAS.

Taxon
baby cornt0
Treatment
soil application of Zn @ 6 kg ha-1+one foliar spray @ 0.05% Zn at 25 DASe1
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
higheste1
Value
45.26 g plant-1e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80
e1

“highest (45.26 g plant-1) dry matter accumulation resulted with soil application of Zn @ 6 kg ha-1+one foliar spray @ 0.05% Zn at 25 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–906

Title

Effect of zinc on growth, yields, zinc use efficiency and economics in baby corn

Jnana Bharati Palai; N C Sarkar; Jagadish Jena 2018. doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.27441.63847

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-39fa201c42e16a06b55f82c84916266dc251dcef4358d9f3b867578782ba8fa5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this claim · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Zinc 15 kg/ha with 1.5% foliar boron gave the highest grain yield (6.33 t/ha) in maize.

    Effect of Soil Application of Zinc and Foliar Application of Boron on Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2023

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Azotobacter 25 g/kg + PSB 25 g/kg + 1% Zn + B 1% gave higher gross return (INR 1,49,119.5/ha) in maize.

    Effect of Biofertilizers and Zinc Micronutrients on yield and Economics of Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2024

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. negative
    Adding Zn to the intermediate Fe level accentuated Fe deficiency and depressed corn yield.

    Nutrient Balance Involving Phosphorus, Iron, and Zinc · 1965 · compared with intermediate Fe level

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Corn yield at zero zinc and 3.0 mM phosphorus was significantly lower than at 1.0 mM phosphorus.

    Potential for Phosphorus Toxicity in Zinc‐Stressed Corn and Potato · 1981 · compared with 1.0 m M P

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Most foliar Zn applications had no grain-yield effect.

    Effect of Foliar Micronutrients (B, Mn, Fe, Zn) on Maize Grain Yield, Micronutrient Recovery, Uptake, and Partitioning · 2021

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    In a pot experiment the highest Zn rate (250 ppm) slightly reduced corn yield.

    EFFECTS OF SOIL PROPERTIES AND AMENDMENTS ON THE AVAILABILITY OF ZINC IN SOILS · 1974

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Zn alone or P alone reduced aboveground dry matter and yield at harvest by 8-85% in LCV and FER soils relative to unfertilized plants

    Combining P and Zn fertilization to enhance yield and grain quality in maize grown on Mediterranean soils · 2021 · compared with unfertilized (control) plants

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Maize grain yield did not respond to zinc application.

    Yield-limiting plant nutrients for maize production in northwest Ethiopia · 2022

    Opposite direction

432 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Zinc 15 kg/ha with 1.5% foliar boron gave the highest grain yield (6.33 t/ha) in maize.

    Effect of Soil Application of Zinc and Foliar Application of Boron on Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2023

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. no effect
    Foliar fungicides did not significantly improve yield in damaged or nondamaged plots.

    Effect of Foliar Fungicides on Corn with Simulated Hail Damage · 2009 · compared with nontreated controls

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    More than three spray applications generally gave no further yield gain.

    Maize Yield Response to Chemical Control of Spodoptera frugiperda at Different Plant Growth Stages in South Africa · 2021

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Foliar fertilizer applied from 2 weeks after silking reduced corn grain yield by 6.4% in 1977.

    Corn Grain Yield and Nutrient Response to Foliar Fertilizer Applied during Grain Fill1 · 1982

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Corn yield reduction was 1.5 times greater with proportional volume at the 12.5% rate.

    Effect of Carrier Volume on Corn (Zea mays) and Soybean (Glycine max) Response to Simulated Drift of Glyphosate and Glufosinate1 · 2002 · compared with constant spray volume

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Nano-N plus nano-Zn with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Offset corn had lower nitrogen concentration and yield.

    Corn Production Associated with Liquid Beef Manure Application Methods · 1991 · compared with corn planted over the zone

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Foliar cocktail caused no grain yield trade-off.

    Biofortification of different maize cultivars with zinc, iron and selenium by foliar fertilizer applications · 2023

    Opposite direction

620 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.