Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation with nanopreparations gave the highest wheat productivity over the years, against a KMN background.

A claim from A NANOPREPARATIONS EFFECT ON SPRING WHEAT PRODUCTIVITIES UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE WATER-AIR REGIME REGULATION OF SODDY-PODZOLIC SOIL · 1970

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with nanopreparations gave the highest wheat productivity over the years, against a KMN background.

Taxon
SPRING WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation options with nanopreparationse5
Outcome
productivity of wheate5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41
e5

“The highest productivity of wheat over the years of research was provided by irrigation options with nanopreparations against the background of KMN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1362

Title

A NANOPREPARATIONS EFFECT ON SPRING WHEAT PRODUCTIVITIES UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE WATER-AIR REGIME REGULATION OF SODDY-PODZOLIC SOIL

T. S. Zinkovskaya; G. Yu. Rabinovich; O. N. Antsiferova Vestnik of the Russian agricultural science 1970. doi:10.30850/vrsn/2022/2/17-20

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-3b9c755cca22e4d2fa08821cfa103d669bcc95b588f7730963ab76aa98392dc6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

251 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.