Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Shoot Cd concentration was over seven times higher with Cd-rich Nu-Earth sludge than other sludges.

A claim from Residual Effects of Sewage Sludge on Soybean: I. Accumulation of Heavy Metals · 1987

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot Cd concentration was over seven times higher with Cd-rich Nu-Earth sludge than other sludges.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Cd rich Nu‐Earth sludgee0
Outcome
shoot Cd concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Value
over seven timese0
Comparator
the other sludgese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shoot Cd concentration was over seven times higher from Cd rich Nu‐Earth sludge as compared to the other sludges.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1394
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44

Title

Residual Effects of Sewage Sludge on Soybean: I. Accumulation of Heavy Metals

J. R. Heckman; J. S. Angle; R. L. Chaney Journal of Environmental Quality 1987. doi:10.2134/jeq1987.00472425001600020004x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-3df85474da192bfb2bef2a5907b7de4a6d727972db684f5bf01b0815eab13dd5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

cadmium atom · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 1 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.