Intervention effectmodel-written summary

F1 biochar silica with full NPK higher rice productivity.

A claim from Effect of gamma irradiation on silica-enriched biochar and biofertilizer on the productivity of rice grown on degraded Latosol soil · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 biochar silica with full NPK higher rice productivity.

Treatment
F1 formula combined with the full NPK dose (R2)e0
Outcome
rice productivitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–100
e0

“The results showed that the F1 formula combined with the full NPK dose (R2) significantly improved soil structure, increased organic carbon content, and enhanced nutrient uptake efficiency, which in turn, promoted higher rice productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–1006

Title

Effect of gamma irradiation on silica-enriched biochar and biofertilizer on the productivity of rice grown on degraded Latosol soil

Nur Robifahmi; Muftia Hanani; Taufiq Bachtiar; et al. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management 2025. doi:10.15243/jdmlm.2025.124.8471

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-440e8b9aa31f3d2c7f213fb5a77d6d234cb7ee75fcb11db48e57be4e764eaefd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this claim · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

3,446 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.