Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sprays had no effect on fruit yield, mean fruit weight or colour compared with water-sprayed control trees.

A claim from YIELD AND “JONAGOLD” APPLE FRUIT QUALITY AS INFLUENCED BY SPRING SPRAYS WITH COMMERCIAL ROSATOP MATERIAL CONTAINING CALCIUM AND BORON · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays had no effect on fruit yield, mean fruit weight or colour compared with water-sprayed control trees.

Treatment
Studied sprayse0
Outcome
fruit yield, mean fruit weight, colore0
Direction
had no effecte0
Comparator
watere2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Studied sprays had no effect on fruit yield, mean fruit weight, color, and fruit maturity status at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1085
e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–184
e2

“Trees sprayed with water served as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–976

Title

YIELD AND “JONAGOLD” APPLE FRUIT QUALITY AS INFLUENCED BY SPRING SPRAYS WITH COMMERCIAL ROSATOP MATERIAL CONTAINING CALCIUM AND BORON

Pawel Wojcik Journal of Plant Nutrition 2002. doi:10.1081/pln-120003934

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-454d30e7facdb9f7a31cc86cd1cd3234688760455ca61bb88419ad015fc869c9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

application · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 58 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 58 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.