Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Side-deep fertilization of CRBF increased NUE by 12.78% compared with broadcast fertilization.

A claim from Single-time fertilization with controlled release blended fertilizer optimizes soil nitrogen distribution and root characteristics to increase conventional japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.) grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Side-deep fertilization of CRBF increased NUE by 12.78% compared with broadcast fertilization.

Treatment
Side-deep fertilization of CRBFe0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.78%e0
Comparator
broadcaste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Side-deep fertilization of CRBF further increased NUE by 12.78% compared to broadcast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1305
t0

“japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 156–187

Title

Single-time fertilization with controlled release blended fertilizer optimizes soil nitrogen distribution and root characteristics to increase conventional japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.) grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency

Yuhui Wang; Jie Sun; Shen Gao; et al. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jia.2025.02.034

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-47b6e85f2c8e7b49baf05c70d3ad52e685fe4c42f36c08260ea964a82879765e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

211 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.