Intervention effectmodel-written summary

DM of ACSAD1115 was not affected by the watering regime.

A claim from Evaluation of Water Stress Tolerance in Advanced Breeding Lines of Durum and Bread Wheat Using 13C · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DM of ACSAD1115 was not affected by the watering regime.

Material
1115e7
Treatment
watering regimee7
Outcome
DMe7
Direction
not affectede7

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“of durum (DW) and bread (BW) wheat grown under well water (I1) and water stress conditions (I2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–264
e7

“However, DM of ACSAD883 and 1115 were not affected by watering regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–916

Title

Evaluation of Water Stress Tolerance in Advanced Breeding Lines of Durum and Bread Wheat Using 13C

Fawaz Kurdali; Farid Al-Ain; Mohammad Al-Chammaa CyberLeninK (CyberLeninka) 2018

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-4deeee6bdf574e749ea3157e1544d7780f648b99aa3cfd08b5ec1208355a7cdd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 177 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.