Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Metribuzin at 200 g/ha raised wheat yield versus a weedy check.

A claim from Weed dynamics and productivity under different tillage and weed-management practices in maize (Zea mays)wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping sequence · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin at 200 g/ha raised wheat yield versus a weedy check.

Treatment
metribuzin (200 g/ha) at 30 DASe0
Outcome
yields of maize and wheate0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of metribuzin (200 g/ha) at 30 DAS in wheat significantly reduced weed density, biomass and recorded significantly higher yields of maize and wheat respectively, over weedy check in both maize and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1184

Title

Weed dynamics and productivity under different tillage and weed-management practices in maize (Zea mays)wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping sequence

LOBZANG STANZEN; ANIL KUMAR; B.C. SHARMA; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v61i4.4411

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-4e4a405747cbcdf85d1c4b37f330828213315388e4eebcf30a6ee8f28d219415 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this claim · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.