Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zero tillage in maize with conventional tillage in wheat gave the lowest cultivation cost.

A claim from Weed dynamics and productivity under different tillage and weed-management practices in maize (Zea mays)wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping sequence · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage in maize with conventional tillage in wheat gave the lowest cultivation cost.

Treatment
zero tillage in maize and conventional tillage in wheate0
Outcome
cost of cultivatione0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
continuous zero tillage in both the crope0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adoption of zero tillage in maize and conventional tillage in wheat also proved economically beneficial with the highest benefit: cost ratio and the lowest cost of cultivation in maizewheat system followed by continuous zero tillage in both the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1465

Title

Weed dynamics and productivity under different tillage and weed-management practices in maize (Zea mays)wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping sequence

LOBZANG STANZEN; ANIL KUMAR; B.C. SHARMA; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v61i4.4411

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-74e2a511fd02f014ff6fe2aaa5be326630229016ea3f9292892f213fb403f3fe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

Zea mays · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 52 positive, 9 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.