Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The specified soil and foliar zinc application produced the highest cob, corn and husk yields.

A claim from Effect of Zinc Fertilization on Yield of Baby Corn (Zea Mays L.) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified soil and foliar zinc application produced the highest cob, corn and husk yields.

Taxon
Baby Cornt0
Treatment
soil application of ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + foliar spray of ZnSO4 @ 0.2% at 25 DASe0
Outcome
cob yield, corn yield, husk yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“cob yield, corn yield, husk yield and green fodder yield were highest with soil application of ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + foliar spray of ZnSO4 @ 0.2% at 25 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–836
t0

“Baby Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50

Title

Effect of Zinc Fertilization on Yield of Baby Corn (Zea Mays L.)

shaikh wasim 2020. doi:10.35841/agronomy.3.s4.6-6

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-50b5c8ac8beab10ca3d308e435384e52fdde071e3d09bdeb207e33c71af04ff8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

128 papers: 124 positive, 4 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
    M1 plus S8 was on par with M1 plus S4.

    Growth and Yield of Rabi Maize (Zea mays L.) at Different Planting Densities and N-Levels · 2017 · compared with M1 (1,00,000 plants ha-1) and S4 (300 kg N ha-1)

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

620 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.