Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Splitting nitrogen as 25% basal, 45% at first irrigation, 25% at flowering and 5% as a milk-stage foliar spray significantly improved growth and productivity parameters over the rest of the nitrogen scheduling.

A claim from Effect of nitrogen doses and scheduling on yield, quality and uptake of NPK under late sown wheat · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Splitting nitrogen as 25% basal, 45% at first irrigation, 25% at flowering and 5% as a milk-stage foliar spray significantly improved growth and productivity parameters over the rest of the nitrogen scheduling.

Treatment
25% basal + 45% at Ist irrigation + 25% at flowering + 5% at milk stage (as a foliar spray)e7
Outcome
growth and productivity parameterse7
Direction
improvede7
Comparator
rest of the nitrogen schedulinge7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“under late sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–97
e7

“The growth and productivity parameters got significantly improved when the nitrogen was applied as 25% basal + 45% at Ist irrigation + 25% at flowering + 5% at milk stage (as a foliar spray) over rest of the nitrogen scheduling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–670

Title

Effect of nitrogen doses and scheduling on yield, quality and uptake of NPK under late sown wheat

Ajay Kumar Pandey; R.S. Kureel; U.N. Shukla; et al. BIOINFOLET - A Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences 2014

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-5545516b6e66046219a0b13fb38cf05f0196d4357a57654c4ef16d02a8b94e35 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this claim · 63 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Heat from 15 days after anthesis reduced wheat grain yield by 18%.

    Yield Components of Wheat Grown under High Temperature Stress during Reproductive Growth · 1999

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Flowering heat reduced main-spike seed number by 15.4%.

    Quantifying the Impact of Heat Stress on Pollen Germination, Seed Set, and Grain Filling in Spring Wheat · 2019 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Water stress at both stages severely reduced yield and yield components.

    Growth And Yield Components Of Wheat Under Water Stress Of Different Growth Stages · 1970

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Continuous late high temperature did not negatively affect grain yield.

    Effect of the Duration and Intensity of Heat Shock During Grain Filling on Dry Matter and Protein Accumulation, Technological Quality and Protein Composition in Bread and Durum Wheat · 1997

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Waterlogging at the earliest growth stage gave the greatest reduction in root, herbage and grain yield.

    Effect of waterlogging on the growth, grain and straw yield of wheat, barley and oats · 1976

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Early water deficit reduced wheat grain weight by 10%.

    NUTRIENT UPTAKE, PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES, AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUML.) EXPOSED TO EARLY AND LATE DROUGHT STRESS · 2012

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    An IW/PAN-E ratio of 0.75 produced as much grain yield as irrigation at five growth stages.

    Comparison of Irrigation Schedules Based on Pan Evaporation and Growth Stages in Winter Wheat1 · 1976 · compared with irrigation at five growth stages

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Drought applied at flowering produced the poorest wheat yield.

    Responses of Different Wheat Genotypes to Drought Stress Applied at Different Growth Stages · 2010

    Opposite direction

151 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this claim · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Foliar N applications showed no consistent increase or decrease in grain yield, straw yield or straw N.

    Influence of Late‐Season Foliar Nitrogen Applications on Yield and Grain Nitrogen in Winter Wheat · 2002

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Boot-stage foliar N significantly reduced grain yield of hard red spring wheat by 5%.

    Foliar Nitrogen Application Timing Influence on Grain Yield and Protein Concentration of Hard Red Winter and Spring Wheat · 2003

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    soil application of Fe-EDDHA did not significantly affect wheat dry matter yield.

    Interaction of Iron with Copper, Zinc, and Manganese in Wheat as Affected by Iron and Manganese in a Calcareous Soil · 2008

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    One and two fungicide sprays did not differ significantly in increasing wheat grain yield.

    Reduction of Winter Wheat Yield Losses Caused by Stripe Rust through Fungicide Management · 2016 · compared with One

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Boot stage foliar nitrogen reduced spring wheat grain yield by 5%.

    Foliar Nitrogen Application Timing Influence on Grain Yield and Protein Concentration of Hard Red Winter and Spring Wheat · 2003

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Foliar Zn had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

    Foliar zinc fertilization improves the zinc nutritional value of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain · 2011

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Nano-N plus nano-Zn with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Starting sprays eight weeks after emergence increased yield losses versus starting at emergence.

    Role of winter-active aphids spreading Barley yellow dwarf virus in decreasing wheat yields in a Mediterranean-type environment · 2005 · compared with regular applications started at emergence

    Opposite direction

868 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Minimum irrigation lowered average winter wheat yield by 14% versus full irrigation.

    Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.

    Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat · 1994 · compared with good quality water

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Saline irrigation caused soil salinization and reduced wheat growth and yield.

    Effect of Straw Biochar on Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Saline Water Irrigation · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Wastewater irrigation decreased plant height, leaf area and grain yield in wheat.

    Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Photosynthesis, Growth, and Anatomical Features of Two Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    An additional 33 mm of irrigation did not increase grain yield.

    Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones · 2010

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    DI water saving had no effect on wheat yield.

    Yield and water productivity of maize and wheat under deficit and raised bed irrigation practices in Egypt · 2012

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Limited irrigation yielded 99% of full irrigation for winter wheat.

    Cropping Systems for Stretching Limited Irrigation Supplies · 1993 · compared with fully irrigated

    Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.