Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In dry fallow, deep tillage raised wheat stand establishment from 30 to 62 seedlings m ‐2.

A claim from Tillage Mulch Depth Effects during Fallow on Wheat Production and Wind Erosion Control Factors · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In dry fallow, deep tillage raised wheat stand establishment from 30 to 62 seedlings m ‐2.

Treatment
deep tillagee0
Outcome
stand establishmente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
62 seedlings m ‐2e0
Qualifier
30e0
Comparator
shallow tillagee2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deep tillage increased stand establishment from 30 to 62 seedlings m ‐2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1043
e1

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–101
e2

“compared with shallow tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1162

Title

Tillage Mulch Depth Effects during Fallow on Wheat Production and Wind Erosion Control Factors

William F. Schillinger; Robert I. Papendick Soil Science Society of America Journal 1997. doi:10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100030022x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-596a73b2dd76da1828f715166b8e550759ae9d387d5bb52cc510ae10c5e9d1d8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this claim · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.