Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Site-specific subsoiling gave yields equivalent to deep subsoiling.

A claim from Site-specific subsoiling: benefits for Coastal Plain soils. · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Site-specific subsoiling gave yields equivalent to deep subsoiling.

Treatment
Site-specific subsoilinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
deep subsoiling treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Site-specific subsoiling produced yields equivalent to deep subsoiling treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–763
e1

“corn (Zea mays L.)-cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–337

Title

Site-specific subsoiling: benefits for Coastal Plain soils.

R. L. Raper; D. W. Reeves; J. N. Shaw; et al. 2004

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-62d41b3ee45e21b38c257317653ca14149fe93296cd881c766036b2ea83a4e5e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

climate site · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 102 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this claim · 102 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

171 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this claim · 812 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.