Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined amendments increased chickpea nodule number 2.58-fold compared with the untreated control in contaminated soil.

A claim from Combined application of rhizobacteria, organic and inorganic amendments reduce lead and cadmium uptake and improve growth of chickpea by modulating physiology and antioxidant status · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined amendments increased chickpea nodule number 2.58-fold compared with the untreated control in contaminated soil.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined application of rhizobia, rhizobacteria, iron oxide, and pressmude1
Interactor
rhizobiae1symbiont
Second interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese1symbiont
Outcome
nodulese1
Direction
improvede1
Value
2.58 foldse1
Comparator
respective untreated controle1
Setting
contaminated soile1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–133
e1

“combined application of rhizobia, rhizobacteria, iron oxide, and pressmud improved shoot fresh weight (87%), root fresh weight (47.9%), root length (47.9%), nodules plant−1 (2.58 folds), photosynthetic rate (63%) and grain yield (39%) of chickpea as compared to respective untreated control in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–942

Title

Combined application of rhizobacteria, organic and inorganic amendments reduce lead and cadmium uptake and improve growth of chickpea by modulating physiology and antioxidant status

Laraib Saeed; Qasim Ali; Muhammad Aon; et al. International Journal of Phytoremediation 2025. doi:10.1080/15226514.2024.2444483

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-7094da7da53bf8ea1c6a297773f0f785ac02591d318c309be7714a16629b22ae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.