Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zinc and copper chelates applied by foliar feeding at stemming increased spring wheat yield by 0.03 to 0.16 t/ha compared with control.

A claim from AGROCHEMICAL REGULATORY INDICATORS OF MINERAL NUTRITION OF SPRING WHEAT IN THE FOREST STEPPE OF WESTERN SIBERIA · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc and copper chelates applied by foliar feeding at stemming increased spring wheat yield by 0.03 to 0.16 t/ha compared with control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
phase of stemminge6
Treatment
zinc and copper chelates by foliar feeding of plants in the phase of stemminge6
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Value
0.03 to 0.16 t/hae4
Comparator
controle5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“influence of different methods of using micronutrient fertilizers on the yield of spring wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–124
e4

“provided an average increase in yield from 0.03 to 0.16 t/ha of grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1455
e5

“compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1485
e6

“Optimizing spring wheat nutrition by using zinc and copper chelates by foliar feeding of plants in the phase of stemming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1385

Title

AGROCHEMICAL REGULATORY INDICATORS OF MINERAL NUTRITION OF SPRING WHEAT IN THE FOREST STEPPE OF WESTERN SIBERIA

Timirâzevskaâ selʹskohozâjstvennaâ akademiâ; N.V. GOMAN; I.A. BOBRENKO; et al. Izvestiâ Timirâzevskoj selʹskohozâjstvennoj akademii 2021. doi:10.26897/0021-342x-2021-1-5-17

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-71563c91ff06ebca1c1f5ec1c28793c35397dba1235dc89d43ccc64f5ff5ae68 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.