Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pentakeep V with full nitrogen increased calcium uptake from soil.

A claim from Effect of plant biostimulation with Pentakeep V fertilizer and nitrogen fertilization on the content of macro- and micronutrients in spinach · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pentakeep V with full nitrogen increased calcium uptake from soil.

Treatment
Pentakeep V and fertilized with the full dose of nitrogene0
Outcome
uptake of Ca from soile0
Direction
Increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased uptake of Ca from soil was observed for plants treated with Pentakeep V and fertilized with the full dose of nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1852
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–140

Title

Effect of plant biostimulation with Pentakeep V fertilizer and nitrogen fertilization on the content of macro- and micronutrients in spinach

Sylwester Smoleń; Włodzimierz Sady Journal of Elementology 2012. doi:10.5601/jelem.2010.15.2.343-353

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-73ea64644629f6ff878664e5eb68071ae96780760688a8c2967f269e63177b45 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 21 positive, 14 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 53 positive, 7 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.