Claim · model-written summary
APRDI had 16% higher irrigation water productivity than RDI regardless of soil water potential.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- APRDI treatmentse0
- Outcome
- IWPe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 16%e0
- Qualifier
- Regardless of the soil water potentiale0
- Comparator
- RDI treatmentse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Regardless of the soil water potential, the IWP in APRDI treatments was 16% higher than that of RDI treatments”
t0“rice”
Title
Mabood Farhadi Machekposhti; Ali Shahnazari; Mostafa Yousefian; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2023. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108546
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect RDI1 produced milled rice yield similar to conventional flooding.
- Intervention effect APRDI1 produced milled rice yield similar to conventional flooding.
- Intervention effect RDI1 increased irrigation water productivity by 22.9% versus conventional flooding.
- Intervention effect APRDI1 increased irrigation water productivity by 45.7% versus conventional flooding.
- Intervention effect Severe water stress increased milled rice amylose content.
- Intervention effect Severe water stress increased milled rice alkali spreading value.
- Intervention effect Severe water stress improved milled rice cooking quality.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen uptake was 2% higher under APRDI than RDI.
- Intervention effect RDI reduced methane emissions per milled grain yield by 77.9% on average.
- Intervention effect APRDI reduced methane emissions per milled grain yield by 78.7% on average.
- Recommendation The authors recommend avoiding puddling to raise water productivity and improve rice quality without sacrificing yield.