Intervention effectmodel-written summary

CaM SF-1 expression was higher after avirulent than virulent race inoculation at 48, 72 and 96 hours, by 24.6%, 26.6% and 38.8%, respectively.

A claim from Research on CaM and Its Isform Genes Involved in the Resistance Response of Wheat to Puccinia triticina · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaM SF-1 expression was higher after avirulent than virulent race inoculation at 48, 72 and 96 hours, by 24.6%, 26.6% and 38.8%, respectively.

Treatment
inoculation with avirulent race 05-5-127 ③e0
Gene
CaM SF-1e0
Outcome
gene expressione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
inoculation virulent race 05-22-64 ①e0

Not reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The gene expression of CaM SF-1 in wheat at 48 h,72h and 96 h after inoculation with avirulent race 05-5-127 ③ were increased by 24. 6% ,26. 6% and 38. 8% compared with that of inoculation virulent race 05-22-64 ①.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–864

Title

Research on CaM and Its Isform Genes Involved in the Resistance Response of Wheat to Puccinia triticina

Daqun Liu Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 2010

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-7ae3d2c2f4c6f7118dd938770d4bb19101e6947a0a2075cd022d3f35db9ae9b6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

inoculation · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 38 positive, 9 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.