Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Hydrogel with four irrigations yielded more wheat grain than six normal irrigations.

A claim from Impact of hydrogel on wheat (Triticum aestivium L.) in sandy soils under limited irrigation conditions · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel with four irrigations yielded more wheat grain than six normal irrigations.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivium L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Hydrogel with limited irrigations (four)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4980 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
4730 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
normal irrigationse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hydrogel with limited irrigations (four) fetched higher average grain yield (4980 kg ha−1) and net returns (Rs. 39995 ha−1) than normal irrigations (4730 kg ha−1 and Rs. 36680 ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–819
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivium L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–51

Title

Impact of hydrogel on wheat (Triticum aestivium L.) in sandy soils under limited irrigation conditions

Vinod Kumar; K.S. Ahlawat; Amarjeet; et al. Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture 2022. doi:10.5958/2582-2683.2022.00057.0

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-82f21c2d5078acbac2147d1942ed799c774c90cd5195b260c5c447169b1188c7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

other · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

223 papers: 206 positive, 17 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

214 papers more in this group

See all 223 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.