Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two irrigations and RCF plus 2 t ha-1 compost gave the highest gross margin of 45,570 Tk ha-1.

A claim from Bio-Economic Efficiency of Co-Composted Faecal Sludge Based Integrated Nutrient Management of Wheat under Different Irrigation Regimes · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations and RCF plus 2 t ha-1 compost gave the highest gross margin of 45,570 Tk ha-1.

Treatment
two irrigations at CRI + flowering stages and fertilized with RCF + co-compost @ 2 t ha-1e0
Outcome
gross margine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
45,570 Tk ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest gross margin was recorded when wheat crop received two irrigations at CRI + flowering stages and fertilized with RCF + co-compost @ 2 t ha-1 (45,570 Tk ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1986

Title

Bio-Economic Efficiency of Co-Composted Faecal Sludge Based Integrated Nutrient Management of Wheat under Different Irrigation Regimes

Nasrin Sultana; Md Anwar; Sinthia Kheya; et al. Fundamental and applied agriculture 2025. doi:10.5455/faa.262368

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-96092b55ba65fa5753cb8e949f8e7202e95c5bb83adf4c8008a8959b8b0aba7c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

crown compound · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 30 positive, 7 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this claim · 63 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.