Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Applying 8 kg B/ha with 1 kg Mo/ha significantly increased the number of mature pods per plant and the pod yield of groundnut.

A claim from Interactive effects of boron and molybdenum fertilizers on growth and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under calcareous soil · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 8 kg B/ha with 1 kg Mo/ha significantly increased the number of mature pods per plant and the pod yield of groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
8 kg B ha-1 along with 1 kg Mo ha-1e1
Outcome
number of mature pods per plant, pod yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment with medium black calcareous soil was conducted to assess the interactive effects of boron (B) and molybdenum (Mo) fertilizers on the growth and yield of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180
e1

“the application of 8 kg B ha-1 along with 1 kg Mo ha-1 significantly increased the value of number of nodules per plant, nodules dry weight per plant, number of mature pods per plant, pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–652

Title

Interactive effects of boron and molybdenum fertilizers on growth and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under calcareous soil

Hirpara Dv; Sakarvadia HL; Jadeja As; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2019

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-98ebb672ca49f37d2fcf208c460fcc61e69f10d3147d0c7406f221293d774fb8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

molybdenum atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Inclusion of Mo did not significantly affect groundnut pod yield.

    YIELD OF GROUNDNUT AND ITS NUTRIENT UPTAKE AS INFLUENCED BY ZINC, BORON AND SULPHUR · 2003

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Co and Mo doses did not affect pod yield.

    Cobalt and molybdenum stimulate compounds of primary metabolism, nitrogen forms, and photosynthetic pigments in peanut plants (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    B and Mo fertilization did not increase unshelled nut yield.

    NUTRIENT UPTAKE - POD YIELD RELATIONSHIP DUE TO MACRO AND MICRONUTRIENTS IN RAINFED SPANISH GROUNDNUT · 1984

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Omission of Mo did not change peanut seed yield.

    Diagnosing multiple nutrient deficiencies that limit crop growth and yield on sands in south-central coastal Vietnam · 2015

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  5. no effect
    Fe, Mn, Cu, Mo and B showed no significant promotion of peanut growth and yield.

    Effects of Microelements on the Growth and Development and Yield of Continuous Cropping Peanut · 2014

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Mo without lime raised peanut yield by 28%.

    Peanut response to lime and molybdenum application in low pH soils · 2004 · compared with without liming

    Same direction

  7. positive
    The highest reported pod yield under 3g of molybdenum per liter was 2320 kg per hectare.

    Study the Effect of Foliar Application of Nano chelate Molybdenum Fertilizer on the Yield and Yield Components of Peanut · 2014

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Molybdenum at 1 kg ha–1 produced the maximum 9.58 pods per plant.

    Effect of different levels of boron and molybdenum on growth and yield of summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under medium black calcareous soils of south Saurashtra region of Gujarat · 2017

    Same direction

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.