Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Elevated CO2 and soil warming decreased wheat K, Ca and Mg accumulation.

A claim from Soil warming enhances the hidden shift of elemental stoichiometry by elevated CO2 in wheat · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and soil warming decreased wheat K, Ca and Mg accumulation.

Treatment
combination of elevated [CO2] and soil warminge1
Outcome
plant K, Ca and Mg accumulatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but decreased plant K, Ca and Mg accumulation and their concentrations in the leaves, stems, roots and grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–611
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90
e1

“the combination of elevated [CO2] and soil warming improved wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–499

Title

Soil warming enhances the hidden shift of elemental stoichiometry by elevated CO2 in wheat

Xiangnan Li; Dong Jiang; Fulai Liu Scientific Reports 2016. doi:10.1038/srep23313

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-9c96bee2bd9ed6d73700f3fcbfdd4aefebe89e13fbbaa8cfb54a8344844d5475 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

heat · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

31 papers: 9 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

co2 · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

63 papers: 23 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.