Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Copper spray increased wheat grain yield significantly, by around 8% at 0.018% copper, during the 429 mm season in soil 2.

A claim from Efficacy of copper foliar spray in preventing copper deficiency of rainfed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown in a calcareous soil · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper spray increased wheat grain yield significantly, by around 8% at 0.018% copper, during the 429 mm season in soil 2.

Treatment
0.018% of Cue0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
8%e0
Qualifier
rainfall season (429 mm)e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant grain yield increase, due to Cu spray, was revealed during the rainfall season (429 mm) in soil “2”. This increase was around 8% at 0.018% of Cu compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1111
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80

Title

Efficacy of copper foliar spray in preventing copper deficiency of rainfed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown in a calcareous soil

Amlal Fouad; Drissi Saad; Makroum Kacem; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1739294

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-9ca2fcb44c88a232af9fbd9662e448f12c0816dc792008264cb177c1edf1bf74 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.