Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fe-coated urea gave the highest grains per spike, 60.2.

A claim from Iron Biofortification of Wheat Grains with Various Iron Fertilization Techniques · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe-coated urea gave the highest grains per spike, 60.2.

Treatment
Iron coated urea (T3)e0
Outcome
number of grains per spikee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
60.2e0
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron coated urea (T3) succeeded to obtain the highest number of grains per spike (60.2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–947
e1

“wheat (variety NBW-232)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–388
e2

“T1 (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–544

Title

Iron Biofortification of Wheat Grains with Various Iron Fertilization Techniques

Saima Kalsoom Babar; Zeeshan Mashori; Nizamuddin Depar; et al. Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences 2025. doi:10.38211/joarps.2025.06.318

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-a021c98cb1cce08d1263a241fb792426d1645e7e660c23ec6328ce1630ecddef · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Soil or foliar application of FeSO4 and ZnSO4, alone or combined, increased plant height, tiller number and spike length of wheat.

    Biofortification with Zinc and Iron Improves the Grain Quality and Yield of Wheat Crop · 2020

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    soil application of Fe-EDDHA did not significantly affect wheat dry matter yield.

    Interaction of Iron with Copper, Zinc, and Manganese in Wheat as Affected by Iron and Manganese in a Calcareous Soil · 2008

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Severe iron decrement did not affect crop growth or yield contributing parameters.

    Effects of Iron on the Wheat Crop (Triticum aestivum L.) by Uptake of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium · 2012

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Iron did not significantly influence wheat growth and yield.

    Effect of sulphur and micronutrients on growth, nutrient content and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). · 2000

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Salmag with Fe had a slightly weaker grain yield effect than pure Salmag.

    New Fertilisers with Innovative Chelates in Wheat Cultivation · 2024 · compared with pure Salmag®

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Fe addition had no effect on wheat grain yield.

    Loading of zinc and iron in grains of different wheat genotypes in the calcareous and floodplain soils of Bangladesh · 2023

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Micronutrients (Zn, Cu, Fe and Mn) had no significant effect on wheat yield.

    Maximizing wheat yield through integrated use of farmyard manure and fertilizers · 2016

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Additional iron did not change wheat yield or iron or manganese uptake.

    Response to iron and manganese application as affected by their availability in a Typic Natraqualf · 1994

    Opposite direction

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this claim · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    The lowest N rates reduced grain number per square metre at any given photothermal quotient.

    The effects of radiation and nitrogen on number of grains in wheat · 1995

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Severe drought with low nitrogen reduced grain yields.

    Nitrogen Nutrition Improves the Potential of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to Alleviate the Effects of Drought Stress during Vegetative Growth Periods · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Low nitrogen reduced grain yield to 4.3 t/ha.

    The Effects of Prolonged Drought and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Root and Shoot Growth and Water Uptake by Winter Wheat · 1989 · compared with both N and water

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Terminal spikelet production was delayed by about 2 d at these N treatments in Aroona.

    Leaf Emergence, Tiller Growth, and Apical Development of Nitrogen‐Dificient Spring Wheat · 1993

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nitrogen level, N timing and seeding rate had no significant effect on spring wheat grain yield across environments.

    Seeding Rate and Nitrogen Management Effects on Spring Wheat Yield and Yield Components · 2007

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    ear weight changed with two nitrogen treatments.

    Effect of source‐sink relations and nitrogen nutrition on senescence and N remobilization in the flag leaf of wheat · 1991

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    In some environments, higher nitrogen rates lowered wheat yield.

    Graphic Analysis of Genotype, Environment, Nitrogen Fertilizer, and Their Interactions on Spring Wheat Yield · 2004

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nitrogen timing did not significantly affect grain yield.

    Hard Red Spring Wheat Response to Row Spacing, Seeding Rate, and Nitrogen · 2008

    Opposite direction

2,052 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.