Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar spray of 0.5% chelated Zn-EDTA at 20, 40, 60 and 80 DAS saved irrigation water per tonne of wheat relative to 5 kg Zn ha−1 as chelated Zn-EDTA soil application.

A claim from Enhancing nutrient translocation, yields and water productivity of wheat under rice–wheat cropping system through zinc nutrition and residual effect of green manuring · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 0.5% chelated Zn-EDTA at 20, 40, 60 and 80 DAS saved irrigation water per tonne of wheat relative to 5 kg Zn ha−1 as chelated Zn-EDTA soil application.

Treatment
Foliar spray of 0.5% chelated Zn-EDTA at 20, 40, 60 and 80 DASe5
Outcome
irrigation watere5
Direction
savede5
Value
55.5 × 103e5
Comparator
residual effect of 5 kg Zn ha−1 through chelated Zn-EDTA as soil applicatione5
Setting
New Delhi, Indiae2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Foliar spray of 0.5% chelated Zn-EDTA at 20, 40, 60 and 80 DAS saved about 55.5 × 103, 47 × 103 and 13 × 103 L irrigation water per tonne wheat over residual effect of 5 kg Zn ha−1 through chelated Zn-EDTA as soil application, 2.5 kg Zn ha−1 through chelated Zn-EDTA as soil application + 1 foliar spray of 0.5% chelated Zn-EDTA at flowering and foliar spray of 0.5% chelated Zn-EDTA at active tillering + flowering + grain filling, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1526
e2

“a field experiment was conducted at Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–372

Title

Enhancing nutrient translocation, yields and water productivity of wheat under rice–wheat cropping system through zinc nutrition and residual effect of green manuring

Devideen Yadav; Y. S. Shivay; Y. V. Singh; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1798997

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-a310fa01d82dfce27cbf9f567715ee0f826c73f5224c2032244f128443bc0dc6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

application · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 49 positive, 2 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.