Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Foliar application of silicon at different growth stages alters growth and yield of selected wheat cultivars

Kobra Maghsoudi; Yahya Emam; Muhammad Ashraf

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
63
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To evaluate the response of some selected wheat cultivars to silicon application at different growth stages under drought stress, an experiment was carried out in the greenhouse of College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Iran, during 2012 using a completely randomized factorial design with four replications. Experimental treatments included drought stress (100% F.C. as control and 40% F.C. as drought) and foliar application of 6 mM sodium silicate (control, application at mid tillering stage, at anthesis stage, and application at tillering + anthesis stages) and wheat cultivars (Sirvan and Chamran, relatively drought-tolerant, and Shiraz and Marvdasht, drought-sensitive cultivars). Drought stress significantly reduced chlorophyll content, leaf area, relative water content, grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, grain yield and biomass of all wheat cultivars. Furthermore, drought stress increased electrolyte leakage of the flag leaves of all cultivars. In contrast, foliar-applied silicon significantly increased these parameters and reduced electrolyte leakage. Furthermore, highest positive influence of silicon application was observed at combined use of silicon both at the tillering + anthesis stages in wheat plants under both stress and non-stress conditions. Significant differences were found in physiological responses among wheat cultivars. The drought tolerant cultivars (Sirvan and Chamran) had significantly higher growth and yield than those of drought sensitive cvs. Shiraz and Marvdasht under drought stress. In conclusion, foliar application of silicon especially at the tillering + anthesis stages was very effective in promoting resistance in wheat plants to drought conditions by maintaining cellular membrane integrity and relative water content, and increasing chlorophyll content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced chlorophyll content, leaf area and relative water content across wheat cultivars.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, leaf area, relative water contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced chlorophyll content, leaf area, relative water content, grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, grain yield and biomass of all wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced grains per spike, 1000-grain weight and grain yield across wheat cultivars.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced chlorophyll content, leaf area, relative water content, grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, grain yield and biomass of all wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced wheat biomass.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced chlorophyll content, leaf area, relative water content, grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, grain yield and biomass of all wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased electrolyte leakage in flag leaves of all wheat cultivars.

Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
electrolyte leakagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress increased electrolyte leakage of the flag leaves of all cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon increased the previously listed wheat growth, physiology and yield parameters.

Treatment
foliar-applied silicone0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, leaf area, relative water contente1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar-applied silicon significantly increased these parameters and reduced electrolyte leakage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress significantly reduced chlorophyll content, leaf area, relative water content, grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, grain yield and biomass of all wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon reduced wheat electrolyte leakage.

Treatment
foliar-applied silicone0
Outcome
electrolyte leakagee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar-applied silicon significantly increased these parameters and reduced electrolyte leakage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon applied at tillering and anthesis had the highest positive influence under stress and non-stress conditions.

Treatment
combined use of silicon both at the tillering + anthesis stagese0
Outcome
highest positive influencee0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
under both stress and non-stress conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest positive influence of silicon application was observed at combined use of silicon both at the tillering + anthesis stages in wheat plants under both stress and non-stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological responses differed significantly among wheat cultivars.

Outcome
physiological responsese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences were found in physiological responses among wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1365 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought tolerant wheat cultivars had higher growth and yield than drought sensitive cultivars under drought.

Material
Sirvan and Chamrane0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under drought stresse0
Comparator
Shiraz and Marvdashte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The drought tolerant cultivars (Sirvan and Chamran) had significantly higher growth and yield than those of drought sensitive cvs. Shiraz and Marvdasht under drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude silicon at tillering and anthesis promotes wheat drought resistance by maintaining membrane integrity, water content and chlorophyll.

Treatment
foliar application of silicon especially at the tillering + anthesis stagese0
Outcome
resistancee0
Qualifier
maintaining cellular membrane integrity and relative water content, and increasing chlorophyll contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of silicon especially at the tillering + anthesis stages was very effective in promoting resistance in wheat plants to drought conditions by maintaining cellular membrane integrity and relative water content, and increasing chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1818 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

41 papers: 40 positive, 1 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

application · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

application · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 49 positive, 2 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

128 papers: 18 positive, 110 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

206 papers: 60 positive, 146 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

202 papers more in this group

See all 206 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.