Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)

Foliar applied iron and zinc improves the growth, physiological and yield related traits of wheat under drought

Rashid Iqbal; Muhammad Aown Sammar Raza; Muhammad Farrukh Saleem; et al.

13
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water is the basic unit for sustaining healthy plant life. Limited or unavailability of water leads to ultimate plant death. Drought severely affects the yield of wheat, especially when it occurs at the critical growth stages like tillering and anthesis. Therefore, attempts have been and being made to develop measures to combat the drought effects in wheat. This study investigated the sole and/or integrated use of Iron (Fe) and Zinc (Zn) spray on growth and yield of Wheat under drought stress. Drought was created at the tillering and anthesis stages by withholding the irrigation. At both these stages, different doses of Zn and Fe were applied alone and/or in combination. Results revealed that drought stress significantly (P<0.05) reduced the 1000- grain weight (30 vs. 42g), number of grains per spike (27 vs. 62), spike length (11 vs. 17cm), number of spikelets per spike (22 vs. 9) physiological (leaf chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance & photosynthetic rate) and water related traits. Combine application of Fe and Zn to wheat under drought significantly increased the 1000 grain weight (40g), seed yield (5350 kg/ha), relative water content, leaf osmotic potential, leaf water potential, protein content (16%) and spike length (16cm). The Zn was more effective in mitigating the ill impacts of drought as compared to the Fe alone. While, combine spray of both Zn and Fe, gave best results as compared to the sole application of either nutrient. Results of this study lead us to conclude that both Zn and Fe have the ability to compensate the detrimental effects caused by drought stress and their combine use can be more useful as compared to their sole usage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced 1000-grain weight from 42 to 30 g.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
1000- grain weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
30 vs. 42ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress significantly (P<0.05) reduced the 1000- grain weight (30 vs. 42g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced grains per spike from 62 to 27.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
number of grains per spikee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
27 vs. 62e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress significantly (P<0.05) reduced the 1000- grain weight (30 vs. 42g), number of grains per spike (27 vs. 62)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced spike length from 17 to 11 cm.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11 vs. 17cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress significantly (P<0.05) reduced the 1000- grain weight (30 vs. 42g), number of grains per spike (27 vs. 62), spike length (11 vs. 17cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The abstract reports reduced spikelets per spike under drought, although its values run oppositely.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
number of spikelets per spikee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22 vs. 9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress significantly (P<0.05) reduced the 1000- grain weight (30 vs. 42g), number of grains per spike (27 vs. 62), spike length (11 vs. 17cm), number of spikelets per spike (22 vs. 9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced leaf chlorophyll, stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance & photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress significantly (P<0.05) reduced the 1000- grain weight (30 vs. 42g), number of grains per spike (27 vs. 62), spike length (11 vs. 17cm), number of spikelets per spike (22 vs. 9) physiological (leaf chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance & photosynthetic rate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced water related traits.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
water related traitse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress significantly (P<0.05) reduced the 1000- grain weight (30 vs. 42g), number of grains per spike (27 vs. 62), spike length (11 vs. 17cm), number of spikelets per spike (22 vs. 9) physiological (leaf chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance & photosynthetic rate) and water related traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined iron and zinc significantly increased 1000 grain weight to 40 g under drought.

Treatment
Combine application of Fe and Zne0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combine application of Fe and Zn to wheat under drought significantly increased the 1000 grain weight (40g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined iron and zinc significantly increased seed yield to 5350 kg/ha under drought.

Treatment
Combine application of Fe and Zne0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5350 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combine application of Fe and Zn to wheat under drought significantly increased the 1000 grain weight (40g), seed yield (5350 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined iron and zinc increased relative water content, osmotic potential and water potential under drought.

Treatment
Combine application of Fe and Zne0
Outcome
relative water content, leaf osmotic potential, leaf water potentiale0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combine application of Fe and Zn to wheat under drought significantly increased the 1000 grain weight (40g), seed yield (5350 kg/ha), relative water content, leaf osmotic potential, leaf water potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined iron and zinc increased protein content to 16% under drought.

Treatment
Combine application of Fe and Zne0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combine application of Fe and Zn to wheat under drought significantly increased the 1000 grain weight (40g), seed yield (5350 kg/ha), relative water content, leaf osmotic potential, leaf water potential, protein content (16%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined iron and zinc increased spike length to 16 cm under drought.

Treatment
Combine application of Fe and Zne0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combine application of Fe and Zn to wheat under drought significantly increased the 1000 grain weight (40g), seed yield (5350 kg/ha), relative water content, leaf osmotic potential, leaf water potential, protein content (16%) and spike length (16cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc alone mitigated drought effects more effectively than iron alone.

Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
mitigating the ill impacts of droughte0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
Fe alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn was more effective in mitigating the ill impacts of drought as compared to the Fe alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined zinc and iron spray gave better results than either nutrient alone.

Treatment
combine spray of both Zn and Fee0
Outcome
best resultse0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
sole application of either nutriente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combine spray of both Zn and Fe, gave best results as compared to the sole application of either nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1464 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

64 papers: 56 positive, 8 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

iron atom · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

iron atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.