Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under magnetized water irrigation the aboveground dry biomass of wheat significantly increased by 13.6%.

A claim from Effect of Irrigation with Activated Water on Root Morphology of Hydroponic Rice and Wheat Seedlings · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under magnetized water irrigation the aboveground dry biomass of wheat significantly increased by 13.6%.

Treatment
magnetized water irrigation treatmente4
Outcome
aboveground dry biomasse4
Direction
increasee4
Value
13.6%e4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Irrigation with Activated Water on Root Morphology of Hydroponic Rice and Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99
e4

“The maximum root length and total root volume of wheat roots under magnetized water irrigation treatment were increased by 7.7–8.6% and 17.2%, respectively, resulting in a significant increase in aboveground dry biomass by 13.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1281

Title

Effect of Irrigation with Activated Water on Root Morphology of Hydroponic Rice and Wheat Seedlings

Xueting Yang; Jun Fan; Jiamin Ge; et al. Agronomy 2022. doi:10.3390/agronomy12051068

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-a74e1c240e96b7314747e2fbd87d78cf129e2001943cd8ebf425feb3695e137c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

magnetic · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.