Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Weekly irrigation with split urea gave maximum wheat yields.

A claim from The effect of water and nitrogen on wheat yield on a Zambian soil I. Influence of irrigation schedules and nitrogen piacement · 1985

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly irrigation with split urea gave maximum wheat yields.

Treatment
weekly irrigation and split application of urea at rates of 50 kgN ha‐1 at seeding and minimum 25 kgN ha‐1 topdressed at tilleringe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum yields were obtained with weekly irrigation and split application of urea at rates of 50 kgN ha‐1 at seeding and minimum 25 kgN ha‐1 topdressed at tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–904
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41

Title

The effect of water and nitrogen on wheat yield on a Zambian soil I. Influence of irrigation schedules and nitrogen piacement

K. Munyinda; A. Bunyolo; R.E. Karamanos Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 1985. doi:10.1080/00103628509367585

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-a9674394dcf805a54584f9b550d70348dd8e430ae9c67dd946848c545eb019d8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this claim · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

2,052 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.