Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Omitting N, P, K, Zn, or B significantly reduced their available postharvest soil content.

A claim from Effect of omission of nutrients on productivity, uptake of nutrients in maize (Zea mays L.) and residual soil fertility in Dystrudept of Nagaland · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting N, P, K, Zn, or B significantly reduced their available postharvest soil content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Omission of N, P, K, Zn and Be0
Outcome
available content in post harvest soile0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omission of N, P, K, Zn and B significantly reduced their respective available content in post harvest soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1454
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–175

Title

Effect of omission of nutrients on productivity, uptake of nutrients in maize (Zea mays L.) and residual soil fertility in Dystrudept of Nagaland

MARY LALFAKZUALI Annals of Plant and Soil Research 2021. doi:10.47815/apsr.2021.10090

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-b14570a99f0bac56299b89e92964c18ecdf85e1508fdddc7fd3bf87a10d5ce8a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 18 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim · 390 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

432 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

potassium · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

320 papers: 291 positive, 29 negative or no effect

290 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

311 papers more in this group

See all 320 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

627 papers: 549 positive, 78 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this claim · 69 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

618 papers more in this group

See all 627 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.