Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Direct and residual Zn with FYM improved pearl millet and wheat yields and N, P and K uptake.

A claim from Direct and residual effect of Zinc and FYM on quality and uptake of N, P, and K in pearl millet-wheat cropping system · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct and residual Zn with FYM improved pearl millet and wheat yields and N, P and K uptake.

Taxon
pearl millet and wheatCenchrus americanusTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Zn along with FYMe0
Outcome
yields of pearl millet and wheat as well as uptake of Nitrogen, Phosphors and Potassiume0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The direct applications of Zn along with FYM and its residual amount improved the yields of pearl millet and wheat as well as uptake of Nitrogen, Phosphors and Potassium in both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1578

Title

Direct and residual effect of Zinc and FYM on quality and uptake of N, P, and K in pearl millet-wheat cropping system

Anand Pathak; Akhil Gupta; Apoorv Tiwari; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2017

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-c06e7ff301bec2bc2f8e8da247d042125cde517ee49026a7041e3fa2827e8458 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

259 papers: 249 positive, 10 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

250 papers more in this group

See all 259 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.