Intervention effectmodel-written summary

AM plus Si-NPs plus ZnO-NPs gave higher grain yield than other treatments.

A claim from Impacts of Organic Fertilizer Along With Silicon and Zinc on Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Protein Content in Grain of Wheat · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM plus Si-NPs plus ZnO-NPs gave higher grain yield than other treatments.

Treatment
co-application of AM + Si-NPs + ZnO-NPse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other experimental treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plants treated with co-application of AM + Si-NPs + ZnO-NPs showed higher grain yield compared with other experimental treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1731
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121

Title

Impacts of Organic Fertilizer Along With Silicon and Zinc on Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Protein Content in Grain of Wheat

Maryam Yousefnezhad; Alireza Daneshmand; Hamid Reza Mobasser; et al. Romanian Agricultural Research 2025. doi:10.59665/rar4244

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-c60dc76f90d1e797cae228e5a0b619ca065e4dc1f6ec81af04c955de4c0aeb8a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

zinc oxide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

251 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.