Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The interaction of nano potassium and boron sprays significantly affected wheat leaf chlorophyll content and spike number per square metre.

A claim from Effect of Spraying Nano Fertilizers of Potassium and Boron on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of nano potassium and boron sprays significantly affected wheat leaf chlorophyll content and spike number per square metre.

Treatment
spraying Nano potassium and borone0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll content and the number of spikes per square metere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between spraying Nano potassium and boron showed a significant effect on leaf chlorophyll content and the number of spikes per square meter only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1927–2087
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–87

Title

Effect of Spraying Nano Fertilizers of Potassium and Boron on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Ali Hulail Noaema; Haider R. leiby; Ali R. Alhasany IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering 2020. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/871/1/012012

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-c73186c18f1ca0a30d3ea4df8b26de693b8e784314a4c6f4273e9aec7a40a3c8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

boron atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

potassium · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 51 positive, 6 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.