Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatments significantly enhanced wheat chlorophyll content relative to the control.

A claim from The Impact of Trichoderma harzianum Together with Copper and Boron on Wheat Yield · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments significantly enhanced wheat chlorophyll content relative to the control.

Treatment
copper and boron in combination with or without T. harzianume0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
enhancemente0
Comparator
a control sete0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants were treated with copper and boron in combination with or without T. harzianum . The applied treatments included Cu (0.05 M), Cu (0.1 M), T. harzianum, Cu (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, Cu (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum, B (0.05 M), B (0.1 M), B (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, B (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum, Cu (0.05 M)/B (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, and Cu (0.1 M)/B (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum along with a control set for comparison. Results revealed significant enhancement in different studied growth traits including plant height, spike length, kernels per spike, harvest index, and chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–1096
t0

“The Impact of Trichoderma harzianum Together with Copper and Boron on Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–81

Title

The Impact of Trichoderma harzianum Together with Copper and Boron on Wheat Yield

Saeed Anwar; Ahmad Ali; Zahid Ullah; et al. ACS Agricultural Science & Technology 2023. doi:10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00076

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-291afcb355ff8a78a8a7bb5ea89871301ef99a0bb3553414c3f40f4f6346f7b7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

copper atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

boron atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.