Intervention effectmodel-written summary

18.5 µmol l −1 Al increased leaf fluoride by 19.1% versus no Al over 22 h.

A claim from Uptake of fluoride by tea plant (Camellia sinensis L) and the impact of aluminium · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

18.5 µmol l −1 Al increased leaf fluoride by 19.1% versus no Al over 22 h.

Taxon
tea plantt0
Treatment
18.5 µmol l −1 Ale0
Outcome
concentrations of fluoride in the leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.1%e0
Qualifier
22 he0
Comparator
control without Ale0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of fluoride in the leaves were significantly ( P < 0.05) increased by 19.1% or 37.7% when 18.5 µmol l −1 Al or 74.1 µmol l −1 Al respectively was included in the uptake solution, compared with the control without Al during an uptake period of 22 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1111
t0

“tea plant (Camellia sinensis L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–53

Title

Uptake of fluoride by tea plant (Camellia sinensis L) and the impact of aluminium

Jianyun Ruan; Lifeng Ma; Yuanzhi Shi; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2003. doi:10.1002/jsfa.1546

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-cb9d2e0d56e1b20586d06cd5d5458c2f024dc65b15bc6e1006ab9105f219a8db · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

aluminium atom · molecular: metabolites · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.